Sunday, March 31, 2013

Three Years On, States Still Struggle With Health Care Law Messaging

March 30, 2013

Listen to the Story 11 min 18 sec Playlist Download Transcript   Enlarge image i

Joy Reynolds of San Diego looks at the newspapers on display at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2012, following the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama's health care law.

David Goldman/AP

Joy Reynolds of San Diego looks at the newspapers on display at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2012, following the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama's health care law.

David Goldman/AP

It is hard to imagine that after three years of acrimony and debate we could still be so confused about President Obama's Affordable Care Act.

Is it actually possible Americans know less about Obamacare now than they did three years ago? Apparently that is the case, and the news comes just as the most sweeping effects of the law are about to kick in.

According to a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 80 percent of people don't know whether their state is going to expand Medicaid under the law, a huge piece of the health care changes coming down the pike.

“ People just don't have any idea about how they will be impacted.- Ron Cookston, Gateway to Care, Texas Half of people don't know whether their states are going to be setting up so-called health exchanges, and half of people think the law gives undocumented immigrants health care subsidies � it doesn't. The poll also shows that 40 percent of people still think the government is going to set up death panels to decide if someone gets heath care when they're dying � it won't. To further illustrate confusion about the law, 70 percent of people said they like the initiatives in the law when they were asked specifically about each one, but only 37 percent of people said they liked the law itself. Where Are We Now? NPR's health policy correspondent Julie Rovner says a lot of the confusion regarding the Affordable Care Act comes, in part, from a commanding "misinformation and disinformation" campaign. "It has worked better than the people who were trying to put the law into effect, who have been working to put the law into effect rather than messaging about it," Rovner tells weekends on All Things Considered guest host Laura Sullivan. There are essentially three big pieces to the Affordable Care Act: the insurance reforms (also known as the patients' bill of rights), quality and cost measures, and the health care mandate. The insurance reforms portion has mostly taken effect, Rovner says, and includes things like allowing adult children to stay on their parents' health insurance until they are 26, and not letting health plans cancel coverage after you get sick. These are things she says most polls show Americans back. The quality and cost measures are mostly behind-the-scenes changes that are meant to change the way health care is delivered to improve the care patients get to save money for both the patient and the government. The third part goes into effect on Jan. 1, and is the one that has caused the most controversy: the health care mandate. In an effort to get about 30 million more people health insurance, those who don't have coverage will pay a penalty. "This October is when small businesses and people without insurance can start enrolling in these so-called health exchanges," Rovner says. "That's where they'll be able to shop for health plans if they have moderate incomes [and] they'll be eligible for subsidies from the government to help pay for the plans." For low-income Americans who live in a state that has decided to accept the option to expand Medicaid, they can see if they qualify. As part of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act, it made the Medicaid expansion portion of the law optional. "So we're still waiting to see how many states take up the federal government's offer to pay for most of that cost," Rovner says. Despite the law's efforts to get all Americans health coverage, she says, some Americans could still fall through the cracks if their state doesn't take the option to expand Medicaid. The Risks Of Opting Out In order to get everyone health care coverage � whether a 22-year-old working in a coffee shop or a 58-year-old who's just been kicked off another insurance plan � the idea was that every state would create something called a health care exchange. This is a fancy way of saying each state would build a website and offer folks a sampler platter of low-cost insurance options. The law, however, gave states the chance to opt out of creating one. So far 26 states � mostly red states and mostly on ideological grounds � have done just that. It doesn't mean the exchanges aren't coming to those states or that people in those state's wont have to get insured, it simply means the federal government will build the exchange for those states. One of the states opting out of building its own health exchange is Texas. "Texas has the distinction of having the most uninsured people as a percentage of the population [than] any place in the country," says Ron Cookston, executive director of Gateway to Care, a nonprofit health care advocacy group in Houston. Almost 30 percent of adults in Texas lack health care insurance, according to the research company Gallup. Cookston and other advocates have to find a way to reach out to all those people and let them know what's coming.

"The state of Texas ... [has] great capabilities, and it would have been wonderful if since the passage of the Affordable Care Act they had begun to help communicate and inform our public so they would be ready," Cookston tells NPR's Sullivan. "People just don't have any idea about how they will be impacted."

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has been outspoken about his opposition to Obamacare, saying it costs too much and "kills too many jobs." Perry has also rejected Medicaid expansion in his state, which would have provided care to more than 1 million poor Texans.

President Obama says the federal government would pick up the tab, but Gov. Perry says he believes the state will be left with higher costs in the long run.

In Houston, where Cookston's group operates, few people who will be required to use the health care exchange know anything about it.

"When leadership in any state talks about things in a negative way, it becomes awfully easy for the general public to dismiss it and not think about it," he says.

The federal government is going to send organizations like Cookston's group some money to help get the word out, but he says what they're missing is a coordinating central body.

Related NPR Stories Shots - Health News At Age 3, Affordable Care Act Is No Less Controversial Shots - Health News Arkansas Medicaid Expansion Attracts Other States' Interest Shots - Health News Obamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's Claim Shots - Health News Ryan Budget Proposal Echoes Obamacare While Rejecting It

"The government of the state of Texas, they are not doing anything at this point in time," he says. "We certainly are, neighborhood by neighborhood ... because that's how this will have to be done � church by church, community by community. Unfortunately, we've not had the support of the [state]."

Spreading The Message

Unlike Texas, California has decided to build its own health exchange. The state has even gave it a catchy name, Covered California.

"[We're] doing consumer surveys, marketing and focus groups," says Peter Lee, who is running the state's health care effort. "So come this summer, we're going to hit the ground in a big way with messages that we know will resonate."

The state is hiring thousands of people to get Covered California off the ground, and the federal government is giving the state $900 million to do it. The "ground troops" needed to spread the message, Lee says, will come from the community.

"We'll be funding groups in communities across the state that are based in faith-based organizations, schools [and] unions," he says. "Because we know that delivering this message needs to come from your neighbor, from people in your community."

About 2.5 million Californians will be eligible for subsidies through Covered California, a diverse group of people, says Lee. He says the state needs to have outreach that speaks to farmers and people in rural communities, and in dozens of languages in downtown urban areas.

About half the states are following California's lead, setting up their own exchanges and using what is essentially seed money from Washington to get them off the ground.

"These are states that have said, 'Lets get this venture capitalist funding from the federal government to set up an exchange that works right for our state,' " Lee says.

For consumers, however, it doesn't matter if you're in Texas or California or anywhere else in the country, the law is clear: The uninsured are expected to get coverage by January. Whether those folks will be informed and ready by then is not so clear.

Share 2Facebook 1Twitter Email Comment More From Health Care Health CareThree Years On, States Still Struggle With Health Care Law MessagingHealth CareObamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's ClaimU.S.Pennsylvania Tightens Abortion Rules Following Clinic DeathsHealth CareEmployers Try To Spur Healthy Behaviors With Health Plan Rewards

More From Health Care

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Obamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's Claim

More From Shots - Health News HealthIn India, Discrimination Against Women Can Start In The WombHealthSand From Fracking Could Pose Lung Disease Risk To WorkersHealthNumber Of Early Childhood Vaccines Not Linked To AutismHealth CareObamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's Claim

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Friday, March 29, 2013

Obamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's Claim

More From Shots - Health News HealthSand From Fracking Could Pose Lung Disease Risk To WorkersHealthNumber Of Early Childhood Vaccines Not Linked To AutismHealth CareObamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's ClaimHealthMany Water Heaters Set Too High, Upping Burn Risk

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Pennsylvania Tightens Abortion Rules Following Clinic Deaths

March 28, 2013

Listen to the Story 4 min 26 sec Playlist Download Transcript  

A police car is posted outside the Women's Medical Society in Philadelphia, on Jan. 20, 2011. Dr. Kermit Gosnell, accused of murder, performed abortions in the clinic.

Matt Rourke/AP

A Philadelphia doctor who performed abortions is on trial for murder. Kermit Gosnell, 72, is accused in the deaths of a female patient and seven babies who the prosecutor says were born alive. District Attorney R. Seth Williams laid out the case in disturbing detail in a grand jury report last year.

When authorities raided Gosnell's clinic in 2010 they found squalid conditions: blood on the floor, the stench of urine and a flea-infested cat wandering through the facility.

In court, Gosnell's attorney said his client is unfairly being held to standards one might expect at the Mayo Clinic. A jury will decide Gosnell's fate, but what is clear now is that state regulators were not doing their job.

"Unfortunately and tragically in Pennsylvania, facilities were going uninspected for years," says Maria Gallagher, a lobbyist with the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation. Gosnell's clinic went 17 years without an inspection, according to prosecutors.

"As for Dr. Gosnell's case, there were admitted failures in oversight at the department," says Aimee Tysarczyk, press secretary for Pennsylvania's Department of Health. But now the agency is inspecting abortion clinics regularly and making sure they meet state standards.

In 2011, the Gosnell case was mentioned frequently as Pennsylvania's General Assembly passed a law that put stricter requirements on abortion clinics. Now most clinics in the state are held to the same standards as outpatient surgery centers. That means abortion clinics must have doors and elevators that can accommodate a stretcher in case something goes wrong.

For some clinics, such as Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania, that meant expensive remodeling.

"Overall the cost was about $450,000 to get two of our facilities into compliance," says CEO Dayle Steinberg. The nonprofit had to install hands-free sinks. Tile floors were torn out and replaced with seamless floors that are easier to clean. The clinic's heating and air-conditioning system was upgraded and a new room was built to house sterilization equipment.

Steinberg says her organization already had a low rate of complications � less than one-tenth of 1 percent. She contends Pennsylvania's new requirements did nothing to improve services for women at her clinics.

"They were thinly disguised as improving patient safety, when really it was about increasing the cost for abortion providers � hoping that some of them wouldn't be able to afford it," Steinberg says.

Enlarge image i

An undated photo of Gosnell released by the Philadelphia District Attorney's office. Gosnell, who catered to minorities, immigrants and poor women at the Women's Medical Society, was charged with murder in the deaths of a patient and seven babies.

AP

An undated photo of Gosnell released by the Philadelphia District Attorney's office. Gosnell, who catered to minorities, immigrants and poor women at the Women's Medical Society, was charged with murder in the deaths of a patient and seven babies.

AP

The author of the legislation that put the tougher regulations in place disputes that.

"This is all about patient safety," says state Rep. Matt Baker. "We made it clear that we weren't going to arbitrarily and capriciously shut down abortion clinics."

Abortion opponents were not the only ones supporting Baker's legislation. State Rep. Margo Davidson says her 22-year-old cousin, Semika Shaw, died of sepsis and infection after an abortion at Gosnell's clinic. Davidson delivered an emotional speech on the Statehouse floor in 2011.

Dedicating her vote to Shaw, Davidson said she hopes the law will safeguard the health of women seeking abortions, "so that never again will a woman walk into a licensed health care facility in the state of Pennsylvania and be butchered, as she was."

Now that the law is in effect there are five fewer abortion clinics in Pennsylvania, though it's unclear whether the stricter regulations were the only reason they closed. That leaves 17 other providers in the state. Backers of the law say now if a woman enters a clinic in a poor neighborhood � or a rich one � she can be assured it is meeting a basic standard of care.

Share Facebook Twitter Email Comment More From U.S. AnimalsAlgae Bloom Kills Record Number Of Florida ManateesU.S.Pennsylvania Tightens Abortion Rules Following Clinic DeathsIf Supreme Court Lets States Define Marriage, Could Legalized Polygamy Make A Comeback?Around the NationObama Renews Call For Gun Bill As Momentum For Legislation Slows

More From U.S.

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Health/PAC Bulletins Now Available Online

Searchable and free at www.healthpacbulletin.org.

From HealthPACBulletin.org –

Before there was an internet, with blogs, listservs and web pages to turn to, there was the Health/PAC Bulletin, the hard-hitting and muckraking journal of health activism and health care system analyses and critiques. A new web site, www.healthpacbulletin.org, is a complete and searchable digital collection of Health/PAC�s influential publication, which was published from 1968 through 1993. Health/PAC staffers and authors in New York City and briefly, a West Coast office in San Francisco, wrote and spoke to health activists across the country on every issue from free clinics to women�s health struggles to health worker organizing to environmental justice. Health/PAC both reported on what was going on and reflected back on a wide variety of strategies and tactics to build a more just health care system � a conversation that continues today.

Health/PAC coined the terms �medical empire� and �medical industrial complex� to capture the ways the profit motive distorted priorities in the American health care system. It critiqued big Pharma and rising health care costs, explored the differing forms of health activism, and made it clear that a seemingly disorganized health care system was in fact quite organized to serve ends other than health care. Its first book, The American Health Empire (1970), published by Random House, brought its analysis to national attention. Other edited collections of the Bulletins followed: Prognosis Negative (1976) and Beyond Crisis (1994). Many of today�s leading health activists, reformers and policy scholars got their start at Health/ PAC.

The website adds immeasurably to the resources documenting the history of mid- to late- 20th century American health policy and politics. Activists, scholars, journalists, practitioners, professors, and students will all find these Bulletins a sources of useful analysis and information.. This is not only a way to learn about the late 20th century history, but to consider why certain issues continue to plague our health system.

The site is a work in progress and we welcome your feedback and suggestions. It was a real labor to get these collected and available and we hope you find the site a useful resource.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Law Says Insurers Should Pay For Breast Pumps, But Which Ones?

More From Shots - Health News Health'Sponge' Drug Shows Promise For Treating Hepatitis CHealthCatalog Of Gene Markers For Some Cancers Doubles In SizeHealthAllergy Drops Under The Tongue May Be Fine Alternative To ShotsHealth CareEmployers Try To Spur Healthy Behaviors With Health Plan Rewards

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Colorado Doctors Treating Gunshot Victims Differ On Gun Politics

More From Shots - Health News HealthDoubts Raised About Cutting Medicare Pay In High-Spending AreasHealthTalk Globally, Go Locally: Cellphones Vs. Clean ToiletsHealthHow A Sleep Disorder Might Point To A Forgotten FutureHealthTuberculosis Cases In The U.S. Keep Sliding

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Friday, March 22, 2013

Affordable Care Act at 3: Increased Savings for Seniors

In the three years since the Affordable Care Act became law, the slower growth of health care costs is saving money in Medicare and the private insurance market, helping to curb previously skyrocketing premiums and making Medicare stronger.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that Medicare and Medicaid spending would be 15 percent less -- or about $200 billion� in 2020 than was previously projected, thanks to this slower growth. Medicare spending per beneficiary rose by just 0.4% in 2012, while Medicaid spending per beneficiary actually dropped by 1.9% last year. We are making Medicare stronger, too, by spending smarter, promoting coordinated care, and fighting fraud. Not only does this ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely.� It means that those who count on Medicare -- our grandparents, parents, our friends, and neighbors � will have it for years to come.

Today, we are announcing that thanks to the Affordable Care Act, more than 6.3 million seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare have saved more than $6.1 billion on prescription drugs since the health care law was enacted three years ago. This is the result of the law�s closing of the prescription coverage gap known as �the donut hole.�

Nearly 3.5 million people with Medicare saved an average of more than $706 each on their prescriptions in 2012.

In the case of Helen Rayon of Pennsylvania, the savings on her medications is enough to help her contribute to the education of her grandson. She says: �I take seven different medications. Getting the donut hole closed � gives me a little more money in my pocket.�

David Lutz, a community pharmacist from Hummelstown, PA, described his elderly customers, �splitting pills, taking doses every other day, missing doses, stretching their medications.� �But he says this has begun to change with the savings resulting from the Affordable Care Act, and that�s good for their health as well as their budgets.

After the law was passed, the Affordable Care Act provided a one-time $250 check for people with Medicare who reached the Part D prescription drug coverage gap in 2010. Since then, individuals in the donut hole have continued to receive savings on prescription drugs. In 2013 individuals in the donut hole are saving over 50% off of the cost of branded drugs. The savings on both brand name and generic drugs will continue to increase until the coverage gap is closed in 2020.

Along with savings on their medications, American seniors have also benefited from access to vital preventive services -- such as mammograms, cholesterol checks, cancer screenings, and annual wellness visits -- with no Part B coinsurance or deductibles. In 2012, more than 34 million seniors and people with disabilities with Medicare received at least one free preventive service. Having easier access to preventive services without worrying about the cost helps seniors stay healthier and identify health conditions before they become more serious and costly.

Helen works as a health-and-wellness coordinator at a senior center, arranging for health and fitness activities for seniors older than herself.� She knows they struggle with the costs of staying healthy. �If it weren�t for the health care reform, many of our seniors would not get to a doctor,� to get a check up, Helen says. �It is expensive for us to keep good health.�

Affordable Care Act initiatives are also ensuring that if Medicare beneficiaries do end up in the hospital that their care is coordinated and they stay out of the hospital once they�re discharged. This also gives Medicare beneficiaries � and other taxpayers � more value for their health care dollars. In fact, hospital readmissions in Medicare have fallen for the first time on record, resulting in 70,000 fewer readmissions in the last half of 2012.

The Affordable Care Act is helping us keep our moral commitment to ensure that our grandparents and other seniors get the high-quality, affordable health care and security they need and deserve.

To learn more about how the Affordable Care Act is saving seniors on prescription drug costs by closing the donut hole coverage gap, visit www.hhs.gov/news/press/2013pres/03/20130321a.html

Follow Secretary Sebelius on Twitter at @Sebelius.

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

How A Patient's Suicide Changed A Doctor's Approach To Guns

More From Shots - Health News HealthHow A Patient's Suicide Changed A Doctor's Approach To GunsHealthAs Health Law Turns Three, Public Is As Confused As EverHealthHow Ideas To Cut ER Expenses Could BackfireHealthLaw Says Insurers Should Pay For Breast Pumps, But Which Ones?

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

How Ideas To Cut ER Expenses Could Backfire

More From Shots - Health News HealthHow A Patient's Suicide Changed A Doctor's Approach To GunsHealthAs Health Law Turns Three, Public Is As Confused As EverHealthHow Ideas To Cut ER Expenses Could BackfireHealthLaw Says Insurers Should Pay For Breast Pumps, But Which Ones?

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

How Ideas To Cut ER Expenses Could Backfire

More From Shots - Health News HealthAs Health Law Turns Three, Public Is As Confused As EverHealthHow Ideas To Cut ER Expenses Could BackfireHealthLaw Says Insurers Should Pay For Breast Pumps, But Which Ones?HealthSorting Out The Mammogram Debate: Who Should Get Screened When?

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Affordable Care Act at 3: Consumer Protections

In the past, too many parents had to worry about how they would pay the mortgage or the car payment if their sick children were dropped from insurance coverage. Victims of breast cancer worried about what would happen to them or their families if they reached a lifetime limit on coverage and no longer could afford treatment.

These were real concerns for real people. Because of the health care law, however, they can put these worries aside and know they are getting a better value for their premium dollars.

The Affordable Care Act brings an end to some of the worst insurance industry practices that have kept affordable health coverage out of reach for millions of Americans, especially when they needed it most. Under the health care law, consumers can be confident that their insurance will protect them if they get sick and their families won�t be crushed by medical bills.

As we observe the third anniversary of the President signing the health care law, let me tell you what this means in real terms to many American families:

For Alycia Steinberg of Towson, MD, whose 4-year-old Avey has leukemia, the health care law gives her the ability to focus on her daughter�s health without worrying that she might be denied coverage because of her illness.Tracy Wirtanen-DeBenedet of Appleton, WI, can manage her 10-year-old son�s fight against recurring tumors without worrying about his health insurance being denied or coverage capped at a lifetime dollar limit�the health care law makes lifetime limits illegal.Judy Lamb of Colorado is being treated for breast cancer that has spread to her bones and liver. These treatments cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, but Judy says she is no longer �freaked out� by the possibility that her insurer will cut off her treatment by imposing a lifetime dollar cap on her coverage of essential health benefits. Judy is doing so well now, she�s thinking about going back to work as a nurse.

In addition to helping those with great need, the health care law helps us all stay healthy in the first place.

Consumers now have the right to many vital preventive services at no out-of-pocket cost.

According to a new report, about 71 million Americans in private insurance plans received expanded coverage of preventive services, such as mammograms and other cancer screenings, flu shots, and cholesterol checks, at no additional charge in 2011 and 2012.

In addition, insurance plans are now covering without cost-sharing more prevention-related services for women, such as well-woman visits, breastfeeding support and supplies, and gestational diabetes screening. This will guarantee nearly 47 million women access to these vital services at no charge.

Medicare beneficiaries are also eligible for key preventive services at no out-of-pocket cost. Last year, more than 34 million seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare used at least one free preventive service, such as mammograms and cholesterol screenings.

Even more new protections will apply to most plans beginning in 2014. The new protections will prevent insurers from denying coverage because of a pre-existing condition like asthma or heart disease, or charging more because of a person�s gender or occupation. That means an insurer will no longer be able to charge women more than men for the same coverage or charge firefighters, first responders, and others more just because of their jobs. Being a woman will no longer be a pre-existing condition.

The bottom line is consumer protections and preventive services under the Affordable Care Act are giving millions of Americans more for their health care dollars.

And beginning October 1, 2013, qualified individuals will be able to shop for health insurance based on benefits, quality and price through the Health Insurance Marketplace (otherwise known as an Exchange) in their state. Should you need help sorting through your options, the Marketplace will offer experts and tools free of charge to assist you.

The Affordable Care Act is giving you greater control over the care you need and deserve.

Learn more about the key features of the Affordable Care Act at www.healthcare.gov/law/features.

Find out about the Health Insurance Marketplace and sign up for email and text updates at https://signup.healthcare.gov.

Follow Secretary Sebelius on Twitter at @Sebelius.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Affordable Care Act, Jobs, and Employer-Sponsored Insurance: A Look at the Evidence

Since the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, health care cost growth has been lower than in the past � and lower than was projected when the law passed almost three years ago.

Private health insurance premium growth per person was slower than overall economic growth in 2011, and a new survey by Towers Watson/National Business Group on Health found that the growth in employers� costs for employee health benefits in 2012 was at its lowest in 15 years.

Also, a recent indepth analysis by USA Today found that, �cost-saving measures under the health care law appear to be keeping medical prices flat.�

But ever since the health care law was debated in Congress, we have seen a lot of misinformation, which often leads to misunderstanding of the law itself and how it benefits consumers and businesses, both large and small.

For example, back in October 2010, the Beige Book from the Federal Reserve reported that some employers anticipated increased costs of employee benefits immediately as a result of health care reform, and last week�s Beige Book has been cited by some long-time critics as suggesting jobs are not being created because of employers� uncertainty about how the law will affect them.

However, when assessing the impact on labor markets, there is both analytical and anecdotal evidence that tells the real story. For example, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the reduction in labor would be minimal�at roughly half a percent�and would result almost exclusively from employees deciding to retire early or voluntarily work fewer hours.�

There is also a real-life example of how a similar law affected the labor market.� The experience in Massachusetts is consistent with the CBO projections.� Studies found no negative impact on the labor force in the State after it implemented similar reforms in 2006.� In fact, there may have been a shift toward full-time work as workers sought to gain access to their employers� plans to avoid the individual responsibility penalty in the State.

And, last week�s job report suggests that private job growth is strong.� The economy has added private sector jobs for 36 straight months, for a total of nearly 6.4 million jobs during that period.� The service sector � the source of many of the questions about the health care law � led the way in monthly job creation in February.�

In addition, some initial statements made by CEOs about scaling back full-time workers have now been reversed.� For example, the CEOs of chains such as Applebee�s and Papa John�s Pizza have called their earlier statements about reducing hours premature.� The CEO of Darden, owner of chains like the Olive Garden, stated: �As we think about healthcare reform, while many of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act�s rules and regulations have yet to be finalized, we are pleased we know enough at this point to make firm and hopefully reassuring commitments to our full-time employees.��

Over time, many provisions of the health care law will work to create a more efficient, higher quality health care system and slow the growth of health care.� This is not just good for the health system, but it is good for American jobs and the economy.�

Friday, March 15, 2013

The CLASS Program

There is a critical and growing need to provide long-term services and supports for people with chronic illnesses and disabilities. Help with everyday activities like dressing, bathing or taking medication can make the difference between staying in the community and going into a nursing home. Long-term care helps people remain as independent as possible, for as long as possible. It can be a literal lifeline for millions of Americans.

But long-term care is expensive and it can be difficult for people to buy insurance that will cover these costs. This means increasing numbers of Americans will be faced with leaving the workforce and spending down their life savings in order to qualify for Medicaid. The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) program was included in the Affordable Care Act in an effort to help Americans forced to choose between assistance and poverty gain access to affordable insurance assistance.

Some policymakers have questioned whether the CLASS program is the right way to make long-term care affordable and sustainable. The challenge of assuring the solvency of CLASS has been the subject of reports and analyses since before it became law.

Recognizing these concerns, Congress included an important safeguard in the law, written by then-Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH), that conditions implementation of the CLASS program on a determination by the Secretary of Health & Human Services (HHS) that it will be solvent over a 75-year period.

The Secretary has repeatedly said she takes this responsibility seriously and has firmly stated that she will not go forward with the CLASS program unless it is financially solvent, sustainable and consistent with the statute. Our commitment to financial solvency has driven our work on CLASS over the past 18 months.

During this time we have examined the long-term care market, conducted consumer research, modeled possible plan designs, consulted actuaries inside and outside of government, and analyzed the requirements of the CLASS statute.� We are looking at the CLASS program from every angle. We are doing our due diligence.

We recently received a report from the actuary retained by CLASS which provides the actuarial analysis of a number of potential CLASS benefit plans. This report will be included in its entirety in a comprehensive review of our work on CLASS over the last 18 months.

We are now reviewing the findings of the actuarial report in combination with the legal and policy analyses that we have undertaken as part of our careful exploration of the many aspects of operationalizing the CLASS program. Once this work is complete, HHS will issue a report along with recommendations about how to proceed. We are on target to release our comprehensive report by mid-October.

Health Insurers Brace For Consumer Ratings In Some States

More From Shots - Health News HealthMatchmaker, Er, Match Week, Make Me A DoctorHealthMore Patients Keep HIV At Bay Without Antiviral DrugsHealthPower Shift Under Way As Middle Class Expands In Developing WorldHealthBinge Drinking Sticks Wisconsin With A Hefty Tab

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Cardiac Arrest Survivors Have Better Outlook Than Doctors Think

More From Shots - Health News HealthPower Shift Underway As Middle Class Expands In Developing WorldHealthBinge Drinking Sticks Wisconsin With A Hefty TabHealthAmericans More Distracted Behind The Wheel Than EuropeansHealthCardiac Arrest Survivors Have Better Outlook Than Doctors Think

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

51 Percent Of Voters In NPR Poll Favor Amending, Not Repealing, Health Care Act

More From It's All Politics PoliticsWill CPAC Tell Us Which Way The GOP Is Headed?PoliticsIt's Still Early, But GOP Hopefuls Test The Waters For 2016PoliticsOn Message: The Battle To Define 'Balanced' BudgetPoliticsRetiring Carl Levin Says He Wants To Leave The Senate Fighting

More From It's All Politics

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Carrying 'Dreams': Why Women Become Surrogates

April 17, 2012

Listen to the Story 5 min 1 sec Playlist Download Transcript   Enlarge image i

Since NPR's Marisa Penaloza spoke with Macy Widofsky, she has been deemed a good candidate for surrogacy and matched with a couple.

Courtesy of Macy Widofsky

Since NPR's Marisa Penaloza spoke with Macy Widofsky, she has been deemed a good candidate for surrogacy and matched with a couple.

Courtesy of Macy Widofsky

Last in a four-part report

Surrogacy is an idea as old as the biblical story of Sarah and Abraham in the book of Genesis. Sarah was infertile, so Abraham fathered children with the couple's maid. Today, there are many more options for people who want to grow their families � and for the would-be surrogates who want to help.

Macy Widofsky, 40, is eager to be a surrogate.

"I have very easy pregnancies. All three times have been flawlessly healthy, and I wanted to repeat the process," she says, "and my husband and I won't be having more children of our own."

Widofsky sits in the lobby of a fertility clinic in Reston, Va., where she's being tested to find out if she's a good candidate. Surrogacy runs in her family: Her mother was a surrogate when Widofsky was 12, and the experience left a mark.

"I was very impressed then that she was willing to help a family out this way, and I didn't realize at the time how uncommon that was," she says.

Widofsky's mom did what's called "compassionate" surrogacy, meaning she wasn't paid. Some women do it for family or a friend. Today, though, most surrogates get between $20,000 and $25,000 to bear a child for someone else.

Why One Surrogate Wanted To Help

Whitney and Ray Watts are the parents of 3-year-old J.P. Whitney carried twins for Susan and Bob de Gruchy.

Enlarge image i

Surrogate Whitney Watts with her son, J.P., and husband, Ray. She says she was motivated to help others have a family because her own parents had infertility problems.

Courtesy of Whitney Watts

Surrogate Whitney Watts with her son, J.P., and husband, Ray. She says she was motivated to help others have a family because her own parents had infertility problems.

Courtesy of Whitney Watts

"To me, being a surrogate � it's like you're carrying someone else's dreams," she says.

That's part of what could make some people scratch their head. After all, it's easier to believe that a woman would give up a child from her womb for money rather than a desire to help.

Whitney, 25, says her parents went through infertility nightmares, and that gave her determination to help someone make a family. She says she didn't think about bonding with the baby.

"It was [in vitro fertilization]. It was their embryos," she says. "You just know they are not yours. You're just keeping them for a time to let them grow and then give them back to their parents, because they were never my babies. It's just my uterus that's keeping them."

Not Doing It For The Money

Sitting next to each other, 27-year-old Ray looks adoringly at his wife; they finish each other's sentences when they speak. The Wattses say they were looking for a couple they could connect with.

"It was very important to us to have a relationship with them," Whitney says. "Yes, it's a business contract in a sense, but it's so much more than that." Her husband agrees.

"Had Susan and Bob just wanted to pay money and get a kid, that would have been a deal breaker right away," he says.

Read More From This Series Making Babies: 21st Century Families Gifting Birth: A Woman Helps Build Other Families Making Babies: 21st Century Families Surrogacy Experts Help Navigate Murky Legal Waters Making Babies: 21st Century Families Ties That Bind: When Surrogate Meets Mom-To-Be Making Babies: 21st Century Families Legal Debate Over Surrogacy Asks, Who Is A Parent?

The Watts say the health of the pregnancy � and ultimately of the twins � relied on the relationship developed by the couples.

Crystal and John Andrews live in Bel Air, Md., with their three kids. They are done building their family, but Crystal wants to be pregnant again. She says she feels "special" when she's pregnant. She decided to become a surrogate, and her family is onboard.

She says explaining surrogacy to her children wasn't hard.

"Ms. Becky wanted to bake a pie," she told them, "and she had all the ingredients. She got her pie together, went to put it in the oven, and her oven was broken."

Are You Doing Good If You're Getting Paid?

The issue of money, though, is real. It makes some people feel uneasy because motherhood is not typically financially compensated. Whitney Watts says she looked into compassionate surrogacy � doing it for free � but it didn't feel right.

"I would do compassionate [surrogacy] for a friend, but not for someone I don't know, through an agency," she says. "It wouldn't feel appropriate ... because you don't know what you are going to do until you get there."

Whitney says she didn't want to put her family through financial stress. As it turned out, she spent 55 days on bed rest at the hospital.

Elaine Gordon, a clinical psychologist in Los Angeles, counsels couples on family-building, including surrogacy, and on the issue of payment.

"I think people automatically feel that if money is involved then there is no altruism involved, and that's not necessarily true," she says. "We are all compensated for the work we do, and we still want to do good work even though we are compensated."

Gordon says many surrogates tell her the experience of having a child for someone else is so powerful that they want to do it again.

Share 0Facebook Twitter Email Comment More From Making Babies: 21st Century Families HealthGifting Birth: A Woman Helps Build Other FamiliesAround the NationCarrying 'Dreams': Why Women Become SurrogatesMaking Babies: 21st Century FamiliesWho Is A Parent? Surrogate Technology Outpaces LawAround the NationTies That Bind: When Surrogate Meets Mom-To-Be

More From Making Babies: 21st Century Families

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

'We Shouldn't Have To Live Like This'

March 13, 2013

Listen to the Story 7 min 47 sec Playlist Download Transcript   Hide caption Linwood Hearne, 64, and his wife, Evelyn, 47, stand near Interstate 83 in Baltimore where they have slept on and off for the past four years. According to the local nonprofit Health Care for the Homeless (HCH), a growing percentage of homeless patients nationally are 50 or older, with complex mental and physical conditions. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Evelyn displays her bag of prescription medications, which she says are for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression. HCH offers comprehensive services, including medical care, prescription subsidies, mental health services, housing assistance, and access to education and employment. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Linwood has long suffered from schizophrenia and admits that he was evicted from public housing after stabbing a neighbor in a fight. Many of the city's chronic homeless have criminal records, which makes it harder to get employment. "I'm getting older, and being out on the streets plays with my mental stability," he says. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Meredith Johnston, HCH's director of psychiatry, meets with Linwood once a month to review his medications and screen for behavioral symptoms. "Getting into housing will be a huge stabilizing change for Linwood and Evelyn," Johnston says. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption HCH also runs a convalescent floor in a nearby shelter where patients can recover from fractures or recent surgeries. Susan Zator, a community nurse for more than 41 years, bandages 66-year-old William Jones' foot injury. Zator says this service is vital for homeless men and women who cannot recover properly while living on the street. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Physician assistant Jean Prevas tends to Jones' leg wound. Many aging homeless suffer from ailments not readily visible to outsiders. Medical conditions often go untreated and escalate into more acute health problems. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Albert Monroe and many others sleep on the porch and under the bright lights of the HCH clinic. Many say it's safer than sleeping under the highway or in city shelters, where theft and violence aren't uncommon. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Paul Behler, 59, and Tony Simmons, 51, leave a shelter where residents have to be out at 5 a.m. HCH also cultivates potential advocates still struggling to get back on their feet, like Behler and Simmons. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Behler lost his job as a piano tuner and has been living in shelters for a year and a half. "I'm going to find the way back," he says, "and part of this lobbying effort is making inroads in that respect." The two pass time at a 24-hour Dunkin' Donuts before HCH opens for the day. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Behler and Simmons take up issues on behalf of the homeless population. Here, they discuss Maryland House Bill 137, which calls for proof of identification at polling places, before going to a hearing in Annapolis. Simmons argues that many homeless have lost their IDs but shouldn't be disenfranchised. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Simmons irons a dress shirt at his storage unit, which he shares with three other homeless men, in preparation for the hearing. A father of three, he became homeless after a 2011 drug arrest and has been staying in shelters for 14 months. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Simmons, now clean for more than two years, lost his family and says he's too ashamed to go back home. "I have to find my own way now," he says. "This is my way." Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR Hide caption Simmons hugs Evelyn inside HCH. He has been trying to help the Hearnes and many others get off the streets. Previous Next Kainaz Amaria/NPR

1 of 13

View slideshow i

If aging is not for sissies, that's especially true if you're homeless. You can be on your feet for hours, forced to sleep in the frigid cold, or seriously ill with no place to go.

But increasingly, the nation's homeless population is getting older. By some estimates, more than half of single homeless adults are 47 or older.

And there's growing alarm about what this means � both for the aging homeless and for those who have to foot the bill. The cost to society, especially for health care and social services, could mushroom.

As in many cities across the country, there are plenty of homeless people in Baltimore � about 4,000 by the latest count.

The Morning Shuffle

In the early morning hours, dozens of bundled-up men, carrying backpacks and duffel bags, emerge from an unmarked door next to a parking garage downtown.

This is the city's overflow homeless shelter for men, and the residents need to be out by 5 a.m., before office workers start to arrive downtown for the day.

Paul Behler, 59, says he's been homeless for about a year and a half, ever since he lost his job as a concert piano tuner and restorer. Behler says some days he feels like he's 70 years old.

"Haven't got to 80 yet, thank Lord," he laughs. Still, he says he had to go to the hospital emergency room recently because he had a bout of severe tendonitis and couldn't walk without a cane.

The emergency room is a frequent destination for the homeless in every city across the U.S. The list of ailments for those living on the streets is long � blood clots, chronic pain, exposure, diabetes. It's even longer for those in their 50s and 60s, which is considered elderly when you're homeless. The life expectancy is only 64.

Hurdles To Receiving Preventive Care

On a recent chilly morning, some men head from the Baltimore shelter to their jobs, as cooks or handymen. Others go to the city's day shelter to get warm.

Still others head to a nearby clinic, run by a nonprofit group called Health Care for the Homeless, which opens at 7:30 a.m. About a dozen people spent the night outside the clinic sleeping on the concrete steps. It's something of a safe haven.

“ Their priority isn't to get preventive care. It's to make sure there's a roof over their head and food in their stomach.- Yvonne Jauregui, nursing services coordinator Here, as in similar clinics across the country, a growing percentage of patients are 50 and older. Nursing services coordinator Yvonne Jauregui says many of them are in pretty bad shape by the time they arrive. "Their priority isn't to get preventive care. It's to make sure there's a roof over their head and food in their stomach," she says. Jauregui points to dental care as an example. She says it's not a priority at all. "It's until, 'I can't chew because my tooth hurts so bad and the tooth needs to come out' � that's when we see them," she says. And that makes treatment a lot more difficult. There are other challenges for the homeless. Diabetics have nowhere to refrigerate their insulin � they're not allowed to bring syringes needed for such medication into homeless shelters. Medication is often stolen. And sometimes those with serious foot and leg problems can't get to a doctor. "They are prone to having a lot of foot issues," Jauregui says. "Plus, it's like their primary mode of transportation." Linwood Hearne, 64, is a case in point. He and his wife have been homeless for four years. "I can't balance myself. I can't walk well. I'm getting very forgetful," Hearne says. "I have prostate cancer. I have a lot of mental problems that's going on with me. I'm a paranoid schizophrenic. I suffer from manic depression." 'Living On The Margins' Dennis Culhane, a social policy professor at the University of Pennsylvania, says individuals like Hearne are increasingly common. "We're looking at a group of people who are sort of prematurely reaching old age," says Culhane, who's done extensive research on demographics and homelessness. He says the growth in the aging homeless population is due largely to one group: younger baby boomers, those born between 1955 and 1965. They came of age in the late '70s and '80s, amid back-to-back recessions and a crack cocaine epidemic. Culhane says individuals in this age group are almost twice as likely as those in other age groups to be homeless. Source: Analysis of U.S. Census data by Dennis P. Culhane Credit: NPR "These are folks who have been living on the margins, in and out of jail, in and out of shelters, in and out of treatment programs for the last 30, 35 years," he says. Culhane says people are just coming to grips with what that aging homeless population means. A few communities have started to build special housing for the elderly homeless. Baltimore and other cities are also trying to get those most likely to die on the streets into permanent supportive housing. But funds are limited. Culhane and other experts say it's going to cost a lot more to do nothing. "It's cheaper to have them in housing than it is to have them be homeless," he says. But getting housing isn't easy for those with limited means. And Hearne, like lots of people living on the streets, has a history marred with mistakes. He was evicted from public housing years ago because he stabbed a neighbor in a fight. But he says he's already served his sentence � a three-year probation � and shouldn't be condemned to life, and maybe death, on the street. Enlarge image i

Health Care for the Homeless is a nonprofit that serves many of Baltimore's aging homeless population. Many sleep in front of the clinic, and others hang out inside to stay warm during the winter.

Kainaz Amaria/NPR

Health Care for the Homeless is a nonprofit that serves many of Baltimore's aging homeless population. Many sleep in front of the clinic, and others hang out inside to stay warm during the winter.

Kainaz Amaria/NPR

'Penny A Day Keeps The Doctor Away'

Hearne and his wife have slept outside for much of the past four years, mostly under a highway across from the Health Care for the Homeless clinic. There are blankets, bags and mattresses stacked there, along a cement wall, and a few white buckets used as urinals. About two dozen people sleep there every night.

"I know it looks terrible, but this was our home," Hearne says. "We shouldn't have to live like this."

With that, he leans over to pick something up off the ground. It's a penny.

"A penny a day keeps the doctor away, right?" he asks. "That's what they say."

What they really say is that it's good luck. And maybe it worked. Health Care for the Homeless later found Hearne and his wife a new place to live.

Share 19Facebook 7Twitter Email Comment More From Health Care Health Care'We Shouldn't Have To Live Like This'HealthRyan Budget Proposal Echoes Obamacare While Rejecting ItHealthWhen It Comes To Health Care, Patients Don't Want To Weigh CostsMedical TreatmentsA Clinical Dilemma: Recommending Pot To Patients

More From Health Care

Comments

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Both sides demonstrate in Grand Rapids over plan for single-payer national health system

As a local organizer of Single Payer Michigan, Chris Silva led a rally Saturday outside the Federal Building to build support for a single-payer national health system and dispel what he considers half-truths.

“(Opponents) kind of think what we’re talking about is socializing medicine, rationing healthcare, but that’s simply not true,” he said.

“We’re taking the best of both worlds: public funding … private delivery. ”

The rally, one of 50 planned nationwide, brought dozens, some from as far away as Detroit, but not all bought Silva’s message. As many as five groups showed up to support or protest a single-payer system, which supporters say would save $400 billion a year if for-profit health insurers are taken out of the equation — and everyone would have health care.

Across Michigan Street NW, The Tea Party of West Michigan said the idea of the federal government managing health care would be a disaster.

“I don’t think our founding fathers would ever dream this would fall under the umbrella of the federal government,” organizer Mark Petzold said.

President Barack Obama is working with insurers and medical groups in an effort to bring health insurance to all Americans.

John Gritter, a registered nurse at Lakeland HealthCare in St. Joseph, said the health-care system is in crisis, with patients delaying care until they require expensive emergency-room treatment, or going bankrupt if they require extended medical treatment. Hospitals are forced to write off unpaid bills, putting them at risk of financial collapse, which hurts everyone, he said.

The down poor economy has only made the situation worse.

“This is the real deal. It’s not hypothetical, it’s actual,” Gritter said.

Monday, March 11, 2013

Healthcare CEOs See Biggest Paycheck Bumps

The healthcare industry saw the largest increases in executive pay out of all sectors, according to a Wall Street Journal and Hay Group CEO compensation survey, released yesterday.

Although healthcare CEOs saw the smallest pay increases out of all industries in 2010, the tides shifted last year, as healthcare executive compensation jumped 7.8 percent in 2011. Healthcare companies’ net income rose 1.1 percent, while the industry saw a 9.8 percent one-year total shareholder return.

In general, industries across sectors pay their chief executives based on the companies’ financial results and share prices with a strong emphasis on pay for performance, The Wall Street Journal reported.

“Our study showed that companies proceeded very carefully on both pay levels and pay design in 2011. Directors are taking proactive steps to ensure that their executive pay plans are aligned with shareholders’ desired outcomes,” Irv Becker, Hay Group national practice leader for executive compensation, said in a statement yesterday.

Healthcare execs also are seeing fatter checks, as healthcare becomes increasingly complex, the Coloradoan reported. The CEO of Community Health Systems in Tennessee, for example, has a total compensation package of $21.58 million, far above salaries in Northern Colorado.

However, shareholders of the acute care hospital operator yesterday voted against the pay plan. CEO Wayne T. Smith’s pay rose 6 percent last year, while net income fell 28 percent and the company’s shares lost more than half their value, according to the WSJ.

Nancy-Care: Making Insurance More Affordable for Small Businesses

Nancy Clark is the owner of Glen Group, a small advertising and marketing agency in North Conway, New Hampshire, which serves people from across the state. As a small business owner, Nancy is mindful of her business� expenses, and has had to cut back where she could. But one thing that Nancy tells us she never considered cutting was the health insurance she offers to her employees.

�My personal philosophy is health care is a right and it should be affordable,� Nancy says. �So here as a very small business owner, I will always offer the mechanism by which people can have access to health care.�

The small business tax credit provided by the Affordable Care Act was important to Nancy�s company. For 2010 and 2011, the credit helped with Glen Group�s bottom line. And now that the economy and Nancy�s business are getting stronger, she says: �My hope is that in 2012 we will � take that tax credit and I would like to use it to pay down deductibles or even to pay � one co-pay or two co-pays.��

Nancy first heard about the Affordable Care Act tax credit from her accountant. Her message to other small businesses: �If you�re not aware of it, I would say absolutely ask your accountant because every tax credit is meaningful.�

�The Affordable Care Act from a small business perspective to me is a step in the right direction, and I�m delighted by that,� Nancy tells us. �The health care law matters. It makes a difference in my life.� And in the lives of her employees.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Would single-payer healthcare be less vulnerable to the court than the ACA?

If the Supreme Court does decide to strike down any or all of the Affordable Health Care Act, the implications will range from the political to the medical to the economic.

For me, such a decision will take its place among the more supremely ironic of unintended consequences: a law designed to avoid greater government intrusion into health care will have been invalidated as an unconstitutional overreach of government power, while a far more intrusive approach would have clearly passed muster.

How could this be possible? Welcome to the wonderful world of constitutional interpretation.

Let�s begin by imagining that Congress and the president decided to adopt a genuinely radical health care plan�the kind in place in most of the industrialized world. They decide on a �single-payer� system, where the government raises revenue with taxes, and pays the doctor, hospital and lab bills for just about everyone.

Put aside the question of whether this is a good idea, or an economically sustainable notion. The question is: would such a law be constitutional?

The answer, unquestionably, is �yes.� In fact, it would be the simplest law in the world to enact. All the Congress would need to do is to take the Medicare law and strike out the words �over 65.� Why is it constitutional? For the same reason Medicare and Social Security are: the taxing power. Its reach is immense. During World War II, the maximum income tax rate was 91 per cent (it was paid by few, thanks to loopholes, but still). The same Congress that could abolish the estate tax could set just about whatever limit it chose; it could impose a 100 percent tax on estates over, say, $5 million. If it decided that a national sales tax was an answer to huge budget deficits, it could impose one at whatever level it chose.

(The remedy, of course, lies with the voters, who would be more than likely to send a powerful message at the next election, which is why the lack of constitutional limits on the taxing power do not lead to confiscatory rates.)

So why is Obama�s health care plan, with a far more modest use of government power, in serious jeopardy? It�s because the key element in the plan�the �mandate� to purchase health insurance or pay a penalty�was not based on the taxing power, but on Congress�s power, under Article I, Section 8, to regulate interstate commerce. And that power, while broad, has its limits…even if those limits are murky.

Up until the late 1930s, those limits were more like shackles. The Supreme Court repeatedly struck down sate and federal laws regulating wages, hours and working conditions on the grounds that the commerce power only touched the distribution of goods, not their manufacture. But once the court changed its mind�after an effort by FDR to �pack� the court with additional justices had failed�there seemed to be no limits at all. Back in 1942, the court said the government could stop a farmer from growing his own wheat for his own use, because of the potential effects on the wider market. But in 1995, for the first time in decades, the court said �no� to a federal law based on the Commerce clause�one banning firearms within school zones�because it could find no reasonable connection between the law and interstate commerce.

In the health care case, the questioning by several justices indicated strong skepticism about the mandate. If the commerce clause can compel a citizen to buy a specific product�in this case, health insurance�what couldn�t it do? Could it, as the now famous question had it, compel citizens to buy broccoli on health grounds? (Well, a defender might have pointed out, the government does compel taxpayers to �pay for� all kinds of things in the form of government subsidies, such as ethanol. It could clearly do the same with a broccoli subsidy.)

As a policy matter, it�s clear that a �mandate� is a much more modest extension of government power than a single-payer system. The citizen would choose which insurance to buy; in fact, under the law, a citizen could choose not to buy any insurance, and pay a penalty instead. The whole premise of a mandate is to spread risk as widely as possible; as Mitt Romney used to note when he was defending the Massachusetts plan he designed, the mandate to prevent �free riders� from benefitting from treatment once they are sick or injured. That�s why the genesis of the idea came from such conservative roots as the Heritage Foundation.

As a constitutional matter, however, the idea of compelling a citizen into a specific economic activity raises alarm bells. It evokes the specter of some bureaucrat inviting himself into your home, while checking the shelves to make sure you�ve purchased multigrain cereal and cage-free eggs. (It�s a specter the administration tried to avoid by arguing that the health-care market is unique, one in which we are all likely participants at some point, voluntarily or otherwise. Unlike life in a Robert Heinlien libertarian �utopia,� hospital ERs do not have the power to say to an uninsured heart attack or auto accident victim: “you chose not to buy insurance? Sorry…have a nice day.�)

So, for its effort to design a health care plan that moved in the direction of less government intrusion, the Obama administration faces the distinct prospect of having its signature domestic program shot down for exceeding the limits of the constitutional power it did choose to use.

I somehow doubt the White House will appreciate the irony.

Prevention: Reducing Health Disparities and Improving Health Equity

Today, we posted a new factsheet outlining the many ways in which the Affordable Care Act will reduce health disparities across the U.S. All across the country, low-income Americans, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT, and other underserved populations have not had adequate access to health care.

This means, these underserved populations are not able to take advantage of preventive services available to help them stay healthy and fight chronic disease. Now, thanks to the Affordable Care Act:

Healthy choices will be made easy and affordable. All insurance plans will provide more Americans access to preventive services. Medicare and some private insurance plans will now cover recommended preventive services and states will be encouraged to do the same in Medicaid.Access to quality health care in underserved communities will be improved. Over the next 5 years, the law provides $1 billion in funding for the operation, expansion and construction of community health centers across the country and invests in healthcare workforce programs.Programs will be better targeted through advance scientific knowledge and innovation. The law invests in implementation of a new health data collection to identify and reduce disparities.Create a fairer and easier way to understand the health care system. In 2014 insurance discrimination will be banned. A new, competitive health insurance marketplace will be created in 2014 to enable people to �one-stop-shop� and choose quality, affordable health insurance.

For more information on HHS� commitment to reducing health disparities among racial and ethnic minorities, check out the HHS Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, which was announced this past April. Built on the strong foundation of the Affordable Care Act, the HHS Action plan is aligned with programs such as Healthy People 2020, the First Lady�s Let�s Move initiative, and the President�s National HIV/AIDS Strategy. This Action Plan outlines the goals and actions HHS will take to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minorities by promoting integrated approaches and best practices to reduce these striking disparities.

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Estimated Costs Drive Debate As Florida Weighs Medicaid Expansion

More From It's All Politics PoliticsWhen A Good Jobs Report Is Bad For Political SpinPoliticsSenate Mostly Blamed For Agency And Court Vacancies, But Obama Isn't HelpingPoliticsWatchdogs Not Celebrating Obama Group's Switch On Big DonorsPoliticsRand Paul Talks His Way Into The Political Big Time

More From It's All Politics

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

RNs from Six States Rally for Single Payer Outside White House Healthcare Forum in Vermont

From Talking Points Memo–

The White House may have hoped for a carefully structured discussion with a predictable and prescribed outcome that would fit smoothly into its desired agenda, but during the second regional forum on healthcare reform, the White House heard once again that other options are not only available but are also strongly supported by many Americans.

Maine, Vermont, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and New Hampshire joined doctors, patients, faith and community-based leaders, healthcare reform activists and students to rally in support of single payer health reform outside the White House regional healthcare forum held in Burlington, VT, today.

As the invited speakers and guests entered the Davis Student Center of the University of Vermont, more than 400 people gathered on the lawn outside to call on President Obama and other national leaders to include single payer reform in the plans seriously considered as the options to rebuild the nation’s broken healthcare system.

The Maine State Nurses Association, the Massachusetts Nurses Association and the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association all had RN leaders and members speaking to rally attendees and members of the press about what they see every day as they fight to advocate for patients struggling to get needed care while many either have no health coverage at all or are not adequately covered.

“We don’t need more insurance, we need healthcare for all,” said RN Tammy Farwell of Maine as protestors chanted, “Everybody in, nobody out,” over and over again to send a resounding message to the forum participants inside the building. Some of the nurses were able to go inside and listen to the forum as in began, but others were only able to sit in an overflow ballroom where the forum discussion was being shown on a large movie screen.

But outside the energy in support of a publicly funded, privately delivered healthcare system was punctuated with cheers and chants. Every time one of the speakers said, “healthcare is a basic human right,” the crowd erupted in support of the statement that also was made by then candidate Barack Obama during the fall Presidential debates.

Many of the protestors expressed their anger that President Obama has not given as much attention to the single payer plan, as crafted in HR676, “The National Health Care Act,” as they believe he has done with the hybrid plans that allow for-profit, private insurance plans to stay prominently in the picture.

Unless and until the Obama administration gives serious attention and consideration to single payer reform, many of the protestors said they expect similar or even larger actions as forums convene in Iowa, North Carolina and California. Many of the member groups of the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Health Care had a presence at the rally, including Physicians for a National Health Program, Progressive Democrats of America, and HealthCare-Now.

From Talking Points Memo.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Health care increasingly out of reach for millions of Americans

Having trouble finding a doctor?

You�re not alone.

Tens of millions of adults under age 65 � both those with insurance and those without � saw their access to health care worsen dramatically over the past decade, according to a study abstract released Monday.

The findings suggest that more privately insured Americans are delaying treatment because of rising out-of-pocket costs, while safety-net programs for the poor and uninsured are failing to keep up with demand for care, say Urban Institute researchers who wrote the report.

Overall, the study published in the journal Health Affairs found that one in five American adults under 65 had an �unmet medical need� because of costs in 2010, compared with one in eight in 2000. They also had a harder time accessing dental care, according to the analysis based on data from annual federal surveys of adults.

�For decades, Americans have been facing costs rising well above wage levels,� said Lynn Quincy, senior policy analyst for Consumers Union, a nonpartisan group. �These are real families. . . . It�s very concerning.�

The 2010 health care law, which will expand health coverage to 30 million people starting in 2014, won�t necessarily solve all those access problems, the study said. That�s because the law, which is under review by the Supreme Court, may not alter the trend toward private insurance policies with larger deductibles and higher co-payments or address some of the barriers within public coverage. While the law does increase payments temporarily to primary care doctors who see people covered by Medicaid, it will not force more doctors into the program, or require states to provide dental coverage to adults.

Quincy noted that the law does offer several new strategies, such as new payment methods to control rising costs, which could help improve access, but there�s no guarantee they will work.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/05/07/147985/health-care-increasingly-out-of.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy

Health Care Law Saves Seniors Billions on Prescription Drugs

For the third straight year, the Affordable Care Act provided millions of American seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare lower costs on prescription drugs and improved benefits.� Since the health care law�s enactment, 6.1 million Medicare beneficiaries have saved over $5.7 billion on prescription drugs.

In 2010, the Affordable Care Act provided a one-time $250 check for people with Medicare who reached the Part D prescription drug coverage gap also known as the �donut hole.� Since then, individuals in the �donut hole� have continued to receive discounts on prescription drugs. Discounts on both brand name and generic drugs will continue to increase each year until the coverage gap is completely closed in 2020.

In 2012, 3.5 million people with Medicare in the �donut hole� saved $2.5 billion on prescription drugs, more than the $2.3 billion they saved in 2011.

Increased Access to Preventive Services

In addition to making prescription drugs more affordable, the Affordable Care Act is helping Americans take charge of their own health by removing barriers to preventive services.� Prior to the healthcare law, people with Medicare had to pay deductibles or co-pays for many preventive care services.� But in 2012, many recommended preventive services, including annual wellness visits, were offered to people with Medicare, with no deductibles or co-pays. �Cost is no longer an issue for seniors and people with disabilities who want to stay healthy by detecting and treating health problems early.�

As a result of better access, use of preventive services has expanded among Medicare beneficiaries.� An estimated 34.1 million people with Medicare benefited from coverage of preventive services with no cost-sharing last year.

Under the Affordable Care Act, the Medicare program has also been strengthened in other areas.� Compared to 2011, people with Medicare saw only moderate premium increases in 2012 for Medicare Part B benefits, which cover outpatient care, doctors' services, lab tests, durable medical supplies, and other services.� For those who enrolled in Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plans, average premiums remained steady.� And they now have access to a wider range of high-quality plan choices, with more four and five star plans than were previously available.� Moreover, the Affordable Care Act continues to make Medicare a more secure program, with new tools and enhanced authority to crack down on criminals who are looking to defraud the program.

With free preventive services and more affordable prescription drugs, Medicare is improving access to care and promoting the best care for people with Medicare.

Related:

Closing the Donut HoleSeniors and the Affordable Care ActStrengthening MedicareMedicare: Questions & Answers

Pennsylvania Doctors Worry Over Fracking 'Gag Rule'

May 17, 2012

Listen to the Story 5 min 22 sec Playlist Download Transcript   Science And The Fracking Boom: Missing Answers

Explore key components of the natural gas production process � and the questions scientists are asking.

View Interactive NPR

From WHYY

A new law in Pennsylvania has doctors nervous.

The law grants physicians access to information about trade-secret chemicals used in natural gas drilling. Doctors say they need to know what's in those formulas in order to treat patients who may have been exposed to the chemicals.

But the new law also says that doctors can't tell anyone else � not even other doctors � what's in those formulas. It's being called the "doctor gag rule."

'I Don't Know If It's Due To Exposure'

Plastic surgeon Amy Pare practices in suburban Pittsburgh where she does reconstructive surgeries and deals with a lot of skin issues. She tells me about one case, a family who brought in a boy with strange skin lesions.

"Their son is quite ill � has had lethargy, nosebleeds," Pare says. "He's had liver damage. I don't know if it's due to exposure."

The family lived near natural gas drilling activity, and there was some concern that the boy may have been exposed to some of the chemicals being used. Producing natural gas is a pretty industrial process and gives off a lot of fumes. It uses a lot of chemicals to open wells to get the gas flowing.

Pare's first step was to figure out what chemicals the drillers were using. But that information isn't easy to get. In this case, Pare says, the patient's family had a good lawyer who helped them find out what kind of chemicals the gas company was using.

"If I don't know what [patients] have been exposed to, how do I find the antidote? We're definitely not clairvoyant," she says.

Revealing Trade Secrets ... Sort Of

Enlarge image i

Plastic surgeon Amy Pare says it's important for doctors to know what kind of substances patients she's treating might have been exposed to.

Susan Philips/WHYY

Plastic surgeon Amy Pare says it's important for doctors to know what kind of substances patients she's treating might have been exposed to.

Susan Philips/WHYY

Pennsylvania's new law was supposed to make things easier for doctors and patients. The law, which is similar to those in Texas and Colorado, requires drillers to list the chemicals used to produce oil or gas on a public website that doctors like Pare can access.

But the website doesn't list all the chemicals used; it leaves off those considered to be trade secrets. These are ingredients that a company says it has to keep secret in order to maintain an edge over its competitors. Before the law, doctors couldn't find out what those trade-secret chemicals were. Now, they can.

But there's a catch: Doctors can get the chemical names only if they sign a confidentiality agreement and agree not to share that information. That's a move that makes doctors like Pare nervous.

"As I understand it, it's legally binding, so if 20 years from now I hiccup that someone was exposed to zippity doo dah, I'm legally liable for that," she says.

It's not even clear whether the doctor can share the trade-secret ingredient with the patient or the patient's neighbors, co-workers or primary care doctor.

'A Mountain Out Of A Molehill'?

StateImpact

Shale Play: Natural Gas Drilling in Pennsylvania

Ever since the law was signed earlier this year, doctors have been asking lots of questions. But authors of the law say doctors are overreacting.

"It's not to discredit those who are sincerely looking out for the health of others, but I think a mountain has been made out of a molehill," says Drew Crompton, a legislative staffer and one of the primary drafters of the law. "It's important to have disclosure, and that's what we tried to do. And I think this is coming from people who oppose the industry."

The law was modeled after a Colorado initiative, which was modeled after a federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulation. At a recent talk for local officials, Michael Krancer, the head of Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection, defended what some are calling the "doctor gag rule."

"The 'gag order on physicians' � nothing could be further from the truth or more nonsensical than this," Krancer said. "The provisions of Act 13 are exactly like what we have already and had had in the federal system since the '70s. There's nothing new there."

But there are some differences. The federal law was designed for workers, while the new state laws cover everyone. And critics say some important parts of the federal law are missing in these state laws.

Balancing Trade Secrets And Public Health

Barry Furrow, the director of the health law program at Drexel University in Philadelphia, says writers of Pennsylvania's law made it vague.

"They've lacked definition. They haven't defined the boundaries of disclosure, so doctors are properly nervous," Furrow says. "What can they disclose to the state? What can they disclose to the community? It's just the patient and the doctor only. And this is a public health problem with toxic chemicals. It's much larger than one patient. It's going to be a community."

Explore Shale: Go deep inside the natural gas drilling process � and how it's regulated � in this interactive from Penn State Public Broadcasting.

Pennsylvania's Department of Public Health recently issued a statement assuring doctors that they would be able to share information with their patients and public health officials. But Furrow wonders how well that statement would hold up in court.

"If Halliburton decides to sue a doctor, that's quite terrifying," he says. "You have a very large, probably rather aggressive company, given its history."

Howard Frumkin, dean of the School of Public Health at the University of Washington, is an expert in treating workers who have been exposed to chemicals on the job.

"In more than two decades of practicing occupational medicine, I'll tell you how often I was able to make the right diagnosis and plan the right treatment when I didn't know what the patients were exposed to � zero times," he says.

Frumkin says companies have a legitimate right to protect trade secrets. But he says there is also a legitimate public need to know about what they may have been exposed to.

"You need to balance off those two rights," he says. "In this case, it seems the law tried to make the balance but didn't quite get it right. There are very chilling statements there that would inhibit physicians and public health officials from getting information that they need."

Some Pennsylvania lawmakers are responding to doctors' confusion. A bill has been introduced to remove the need for doctors to agree to a confidentiality agreement.

This story comes from StateImpact, a collaboration between NPR and member stations, exploring how state issues affect people's lives.

Share 0Facebook 48Twitter Email Comment More From The Fracking Boom: Missing Answers Medical TreatmentsPennsylvania Doctors Worry Over Fracking 'Gag Rule'ScienceFracking's Methane Trail: A Detective StoryEnvironmentTown's Effort To Link Fracking And Illness Falls ShortEnergyMedical Records Could Yield Answers On Fracking

More From The Fracking Boom: Missing Answers

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Good News on Health Care Spending

For years, health care costs have been rising faster than inflation, driving up the cost of health care and making it less affordable for families and businesses.

But now, the good news about the slowing growth of health care spending nationwide is being increasingly recognized by independent analysts. Just this week, USA Today reported that according to the newspaper�s own analysis that �health care spending last year rose at one of the lowest rates in a half-century.�� According to the paper, health care providers and analysts found that �cost-saving measures under the health care law appear to be keeping medical prices flat.�

As USA Today put it, �Spending for medical care has increased modestly for five consecutive years, the longest period of slow growth since Medicare began in 1966.� And, according to the newspaper�s own number-crunching of Bureau of Economic Analysis data, health care spending shrank slightly as a share of the overall economy.

A report that we released earlier this year also showed that Medicare spending per beneficiary has continued at a historically slow pace � by only 0.4% in fiscal year 2012, following slow growth in 2010 and 2011 and significantly below the 3.4% growth per person in the economy overall.� And a report released last week shows that Medicaid spending per beneficiary also grew at historically slow rates in 2012.

The health care law�s push for coordinated care and paying for quality rather than quantity is putting downward pressure on medical costs, the article reports. It�s improving the way health care providers do business, and that�s good news for patients.

USA Today reports that incentives in the law that encourage more coordinated and higher quality care are working.� The newspaper quoted Dan Mendelson, the CEO of Avalere health saying �Institutions are taking both cost control and quality improvement more seriously."

Essentia Health, a hospital system based in Duluth, Minn., now does more extensive home monitoring of its 300 sickest congestive heart failure patients, which the newspaper says �has cut 30-day admissions to less than one-tenth of the national average and saved millions of dollars.�

�Until now, the government has paid on volume. Now it�s trying to pay more on quality,� said Peter Person, CEO of Essentia and a doctor of internal medicine, as quoted by the article.

This good news from USA Today is just more evidence that the health care law is working.� The Affordable Care Act is driving down costs and improving quality, which will have long-term benefits for our economy and our health.

For more information on the Affordable Care Act and patients� new protections and rights, see www.healthcare.gov/law/features/rights.